Lowell Sun

Cambodians urged to oppose new deportation rules
By JASON LEFFERTS
Sun Staff

Thursday, June 06, 2002 - LOWELL Chaydy Pel's brother, Mora, is in prison for attempted murder, and could be deported to Cambodia for his crime, but he says it won't come to that."If they send him back to Cambodia, he says he's going to hang himself," Chaydy Pel said. "He'd rather die here than in Cambodia."Mora Pel is not a U.S. citizen and has been in prison for five years. Under a new agreement between the United States and Cambodia, he could be returned to his native country.

His brother and about 150 other Cambodian immigrants packed the Cambodian Mutual Assistance Association offices last night to gather information and ask questions about the new policy, which will target about 1,200 Cambodian immigrants with "aggravated felony" convictions on their record who are not American citizens.Aggravated felonies run the gamut from murder to possession of drugs.

Many in the Cambodian community fear they or a family member may be sent back to the country from which they escaped, even those who have turned their lives around and are now contributing to American society.Community leaders last night encouraged local Cambodians to be united and vocal in their opposition to the new agreement. They want to focus on a bill in Congress filed by U.S. Rep.
Barney Frank, a Newton Democrat, that would change the aggravated felony laws.

"We need unification. Long Beach, Chicago and Lowell are the only cities taking this seriously," said Sara Khun, an aide to U.S. Rep. Martin Meehan, citing the communities in the U.S. with the largest Cambodian immigrant populations. "I know everybody is scared to show their face and show their case, but the stronger we are, the better this bill will be.

"In 1996, a new federal law expanded the categories of aggravated felonies that would cause deportation, but the Cambodian government never accepted the deportees. The new deal with Cambodia was struck last month.Officials are unsure exactly who would be sent back to Cambodia, or when. In many cases, immigrants are expected to check in regularly with the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

At future meetings, they could be told they must return to Cambodia.Khun said according to the Cambodian Royal Embassy, deportees would be given a place to live in Cambodia, but she said she doesn't believe that would be the case. Jennifer Smith, a public defense lawyer, said Cambodia may find itself dealing with a situation where they cannot know with certainty whether a deportee is actually Cambodian."

Cambodia has no way of determining if any of the these people are Cambodian citizens," Smith said. "You don't have birth certificates or visas or passports, and neither does Cambodia."The prospect of going back to Cambodia is a scary one for those who may be on the deportation list.

Smith and other officials are encouraging potential deportees to attend INS meetings and not run and hide, but Cambodians here know their homeland is not where they want to be."We ran away. We came here and we ran away from war and torture, and to be sent back is to go back to that. Life in Cambodia is unspeakable," said Hai Cheng, a board member at CMAA. "I wish, I pray, I beg our representatives to reconsider this."Smith said those with aggravated felonies on their record have little chance of avoiding deportation if they are on the list.

She said there is no timetable as to when deportees would be returned, but she expected many would be sent together on flights back to Southeast Asia.Chaydy Pel, now 32, left Cambodia when she was 10 years old. Her legs are permanently disabled after she spent her childhood carrying rocks up and down a mountain. She doesn't want her brother going back to the place he left when he was an infant."I was in Cambodia when I was 10 years old. I know what it is like," she said. "I don't know what to do. I have no more tears."Jason Lefferts' e-mail address is jlefferts@lowellsun.com .



Lowell Sun

Cambodians push deportees' return
By JASON LEFFERTS
Sun Staff


Saturday, June 15, 2002
- LOWELL The Cambodian community has developed a reputation for not trusting government.But now, it may be the very establishment it fears that could keep some of its members in the country. A new agreement between the United States and Cambodian governments has set the stage for the return of about 1,200 non-citizen immigrants with aggravated felony convictions to Cambodia.

But maneuvers remain in Washington that could keep some of those potential deportees here.Cambodian community leaders are mounting an effort to support a bill filed by U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Newton, that would narrow the provisions of the aggravated felony law.

At a meeting last week, more than 150 Cambodians were encouraged by community leaders to drum up support.U.S. Rep. Martin Meehan, D-Lowell, said he favors the Frank legislation, titled the Family Reunification Act.

An aide in his Lowell office said a number of calls have been received supporting the bill. However, Meehan said he also believes that Cambodian non-citizen immigrants who have committed serious crimes should be returned home.

In recent weeks, some potential deportees have told their stories of past criminal activities, prison time, and productive return to society. Many were convicted for serious gang crimes, and one is currently in prison for attempted murder.

Meehan said those who have serious crimes on their record should be deported, and the Frank law would not protect them."This is only in limited circumstances, where there is not a serious crime and someone has a productive job and had a family," Meehan said. "I don't think many of the examples that have been cited have been examples where an immigration judge would have the discretion.

"In 1996, Congress passed a law that expanded the categories of aggravated felonies that could cause deportation. Meehan voted for the law.But Cambodian immigrants were essentially immune because Cambodia was not accepting deportees from the U.S. Some lawmakers like Meehan now consider some crimes included in the law to be too severe.

Meehan, Frank, and other supporters repeatedly have said the bill does not offer hope to non-citizen immigrants who have committed crimes like rape or murder. Meehan pointed to the case of the immigrant with an attempted murder conviction, who said he would rather kill himself than go back to Cambodia.

Meehan said those immigrants would still be deported, but those with lesser crimes may have hope."Someone with a drunk-driving conviction is being deported, when they're here with a job and are raising a family," Meehan said. "It wasn't really the intention of the law to target those people."The Frank legislation would include conditions that would allow a non-citizen immigrant to stay in the country despite felony convictions. Immigrants could be allowed to stay if they have lived in the U.S. for five years, served prison terms of less than five years, and are considered to present no danger to the public.

Frank's interest in the bill is an offshoot of the deportation of a number of Portuguese immigrants who live in New Bedford and other Massachusetts communities.The House Judiciary Committee, which includes Frank and Meehan, is considering the Family Reunification Act. The bill has been on the committee's list of potential action items often recently, including last Thursday. No action has been taken, partly because of a renewed uneasiness toward immigrants following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

"Anybody who is guilty of a terrorist offense is not covered by this," Frank said. "In regard to terrorists, it wouldn't apply, because we wouldn't want to deport them. We'd like to keep them here and lock them up. It's totally irrelevant in terms of the terrorism fight, and there's some demagoguery going on.

"Frank said he is negotiating with Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., to get the legislation out of committee, and hopes for movement by July 4."You make explicit things that were already in the bill. You can't let out rapists and murderers, and you make that clear," Frank said. "There's a 50-50 chance to get it out of the committee."Jason Lefferts' e-mail address is jlefferts@lowellsun.com .


RETURN


RELEASED U.S. ALIEN INMATES TO BE JAILED HERE 
By Matt McKinney

The Cambodia Daily, P. 12
Tuesday, May 7, 2002 
 
A group of Cambodians who have finished prison sentences in the U.S. for crimes committed there will be jailed when they return to Cambodia, said Prime Minister Hun Sen on Monday, in a ground-breaking ceremony in Kampot province. 
"America has asked the Cambodian government to accept Khmers that went to America illegally or were convicted in America," said Hun Sen. "Persons who were put in prisons in America, when they return they have to stay in Prey Sar."

The Cambodians were living in the U.S., some for most of their lives, as resident or illegal aliens when they committed their crimes and were automatically slated for deportation to their native country when they were
convicted. Their return was secured by an agreement signed in March between the government and U.S. ambassador Kent Wiedermann.

"The agreement that I signed with the Cambodian Ministry of Interior provides that Cambodia will accept these deported aliens back, and provide for ways in which they will be reintegrated," Wiedermann said.

The agreement does not spell out how the Cambodians will be reintegrated into local society, though Wiedermann said it would take time for the Cambodian government to track down families and find an appropriate home for each of the returnees.

He said he did not know how many Cambodians will be deported from the U.S., but an initial group of 28 has been identified for deportation. All have completed a prison sentence in the U.S. for their crimes, and if they were naturalized U.S. citizens would have been released in the U.S.

************************
* NOTE FROM SEARAC:

Prey Sar is a detention center (prison) just outside of Phnom Penh holding political prisoners where torture is likely to occur, according to the Human Rights Watch World Report on Cambodia (2002)(http://www.hrw.org/wr2k2/asia3.html):

"Prison conditions continued to be poor, with many facilities seriously overcrowded and lacking adequate medical care, food, and water. At least six prisoners died within a two-month period in Prey Sar prison in Phnom Penh because of insufficient food and medication, according to a report by a Cambodian human rights organization. The use of shackles was reported in prisons in Kompong Som and Kompong Cham. Pre-trial detention beyond the legal limit of six months was common.

"Torture continued to be used with impunity, particularly by police officers attempting to extract confessions from suspects in custody. Police also failed to intervene to stop violence against women either in the home, where domestic abuse was considered a family matter, or in the sex industry, which is often supported and protected by members of the military, police or other government officials."

**********************************************

Max Niedzwiecki
Director of Programs and Resource Development
Southeast Asia Resource Action Center (SEARAC)
1628 16th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20009-3099
Tel: 202/667-4690
Fax: 202/667-6449
max@searac.org
www.searac.org
RETURN


Lowell Sun

Wednesday, June 05, 2002 - 9:26:17 AM MST


Cambodian fears he'll be deported under new federal law
By JASON LEFFERTS
Sun Staff

LOWELL In 19 years in the United States, he has gone from refugee to gang member to prisoner to mentor.

He doesn't want his next label to be deportee.

But for this Cambodian immigrant, his next meeting with his immigration counselor could be the one that sends him back to the country he left when he was 4.

"I have no idea how to make a living there," said the Lowell resident, who asked that his name not be used for fear that a small misstep would seal his fate with the Immigration and Naturalization Service. "I would be going from the best country, the United States, to a third-world country.

"I don't know how I would survive there.

"Last month, the government of Cambodia agreed to accept the return of up to 2,000 Cambodian nationals under a 1996 federal law that makes noncitizens convicted of an "aggravated felony" eligible for deportation.

In Lowell, home of the second-largest Cambodian immigrant community in the country, behind Long Beach, Calif., the agreement has left those with a criminal record who have served their time including this 23-year-old man scrambling to find ways to stay in their adopted land.

Tonight, the Cambodian Mutual Assistance Association is hosting an informational forum on the matter, bringing in lawyers, a representative from U.S. Rep. Martin Meehan's office and others, like this former gang member, who want to stay here.

Two members of the man's family were killed in Cambodia before he and the others managed to flee. The memories of the Killing Fields of the Khmer Rouge still haunt his older family members.

"My mom cries when she tells stories about Cambodia and the Khmer Rouge," he said. "I sit there and listen, and I don't know what to do except comfort her sometimes.

"While growing up in the United States, he became more and more involved with gangs. Looking back, he understands he made mistakes.

"In the life of a gang, you drink and smoke marijuana, and you don't think so much," he said.

He was arrested twice in a six-month span and served three years in the Billerica House of Correction. He spent an additional year in Louisiana, in an INS holding area, before being allowed to return to Lowell. Even when repeatedly asked, he won't say why he was arrested.

"I'm embarrassed about the mistakes I made, but I learned from them," he said. "I was stupid and ignorant.

"Signs of his gang past remain. He has tattoos on both forearms and a hint of a swagger in his walk. But that life is over, he said, and now he works to keep other kids off the street.

While in jail, he earned his GED. He works part-time at Big Brother/Big Sister's ADAM project, mentoring teens in the afternoons. He lives at home with his parents, sister, wife and step-daughter.

He said he never earned his citizenship because his green card labeled him a "permanent resident." He said he and his family didn't know that meant he wasn't a citizen, and chalks it up to "ignorance, really.

"In April, he went to his first meeting with the INS and was allowed to return home and to his job. When he goes back for a follow-up meeting next month, however, the new law will be in place, and it's possible he will be sent back to Cambodia.

Cambodian community leaders are concerned that many immigrants with a criminal past will go into hiding to avoid the INS. This man said he will not.

"I don't know what to do, but I'm not going to run away from it, as much as I want to," he said. "That day is probably going to be the scariest day in my life.

"I'm not hiding out," he added. "I'm doing everything I can to be positive and prove I'm a productive member of society. I don't want INS to target me as one of the first to go."

Jason Lefferts' e-mail address is jlefferts@lowellsun.com .

RETURN


SEARAC Urges Hold on Deportation

1,400 CAMBODIANS IN U.S. FACE POSSIBILITY OF FORCED RETURN TO THEIR COUNTRY

             U.S., Cambodian Governments Agree on Repatriation

             By Peter Hickman


             “This ruling has the potential to destroy thousands of lives” says Max Niedzwiecki of the Southeast Asia Resource Action Center (SEARAC), “and we hear that a lot of Cambodian Americans are beginning to panic.”

             SEARAC describes itself as “the national organization for Americans from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam.” 

            The ruling is an announcement by the Department of State that Cambodia will accept the repatriation of almost 1,400 Cambodians living in the U.S. who have been convicted of crimes in this country and been issued “final orders of removal.” 

            SEARAC is calling for a hold on any deportation until individual cases can be reviewed by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to ensure what it calls “fairness in the deportation process.”

            The advocacy organization says many Cambodians, and other Southeast Asians, with whom it has been in contact accepted “orders of removal” in exchange for “supervised release.”

            However, SEARAC says, many of the detainees were “unaware that this repatriation agreement would be signed in the immediate future (and) did not pursue appeals on their deportation orders.”

            SEARAC also claims many of the Cambodians affected—both U.S. citizens and non-citizens--did not have their cases “heard by a judge and thoroughly reviewed.”

             Most are Main-Income Earners         

             According to a survey by the center, more than half of the potential deportees are the “main income-earners” for their families, which “typically” include American citizens and children.

            The federal Office of Refugee Settlement (ORR) says between l975 and l999, 145,149 refugees from Cambodia entered the U.S.  The INS says 46,455 Cambodians have become U.S. citizens.

            SEARAC says these statistics “lead us to believe that nearly 100,000 Cambodians now in the U.S. arrived as refugees and are not citizens.”  All of them, the center claims, “are in danger of deportation if convicted of a crime that makes them deportable.”

            Most Cambodians facing repatriation have not had fair evaluations of their cases, SEARAC claims. 

            “In most cases,” the center says, “Cambodians were ordered deported under the l996 immigration reform laws before the courts had ruled on the meaning of those laws.  Many of these deportation orders are unlawful under later court decisions.”  Furthermore, SEARAC says, the U.S. Congress “is seeking to restore fairness hearings that were eliminated under the l996 laws.” 

            No Cambodian, it added, “should be repatriated while Congress is considering this legislation.”

            Asked for examples of what it claims are “unlawful orders,” SEARAC pointed to cases where individuals were denied the right to a hearing before an immigration judge to present their cases.

             Support for Family Reunification Act



            In other cases, the center said orders were “unlawful” because the INS used “too harsh a rule” for determining what qualified as an “aggravated felony.”  As an example, SEARAC said, “some courts have said the INS was wrong on calling driving under the influence of alcohol (DWI) an aggravated felony.

            It is not too late to review many of these cases, the center insists, because “Many Cambodians were told by INS officers or lawyers they would not be deported just because they accepted a deportation order.

            “As a result,” SEARAC says, “the legality of their deportation orders was never tested and they never had hearings to test the fairness of deportation.”  No one,” the center says, “should be deported under an unlawful order or without the hearing required under the law.”

            To help the Cambodians, and others, in this kind of situation, SEARAC urges passage of the Family Reunification Act of 2002 (H.R. 1452).

This act gives the Attorney General of the U.S. discretion to cancel an order or removal of a legal permanent resident “who poses no danger to persons or property and is not a threat to the community” for “humanitarian and family reunification reasons.” 

As this was being written, Congress was debating the Family Reunification Act as well as other pieces of legislation that could affect refugees. 

SEARAC also is urging INS Commissioner James Ziglar to delay deportation of affected Cambodians “until a thorough review process is in place.”  The center says there is “strong sentiment in Congress and the courts to ensure that these cases are fairly and thoroughly reviewed.”

‘They’ve Lost so Much’

Mr. Samkhann Khoeun, Executive Director of the Cambodian Mutual Assistance Association in Lowell, Mass., says many Cambodians “risked their lives moving to this country for freedom and a better life.  They’ve already lost so much.  Forced deportation would be devastating for them, their children and their families who stay here.”

In addition, advocates say the deportation ruling could harshly impact the tens of thousands of Cambodians in the U.S. who do not have criminal records, but are not citizens.  If found guilty of crimes, they say, they could also face deportation and be permanently barred from re-entry to the U.S. 

SEARAC predicts that forcible evacuation of Cambodians would have “tragic consequences” for family members remaining in the U.S., as well as for the deportees themselves.

Executive Director KaYing Yang, an ethnic Hmong from Laos, says most of the people who would be deported under the order “have families and children in the States, but no one to turn to in Southeast Asia.

“Since many of them left Asia as children, Miss Yang says, “they can’t speak Cambodian well and don’t know how to make a living in Cambodia.”

A recent SEARAC study says those Cambodians who could face deportation from the U.S. were on average nine years old when they came to this country and have lived here for 20 years.  More than half of those responding to the survey said they were their families’ primary source of income.

SEARAC says those interested in this issue can contact their members of Congress by going to http://clerkweb.house.gov/mbremtee/members/housemem.htm for members of the House of Representatives and http://www.senate.gov/senators/senator by state.cfm for members of the Senate. 

The center also asks that anyone with ideas on this issue or who knows of someone with an order of removal—and who is willing to speak out—to contact T.C. Doung at SEARAC at 202/667-4690 or by email at tcduong@searac.org.





DEPORTATION OF CAMBODIANS FROM THE UNITED STATES
ACTION ALERT - CONTACT YOUR MEMBER OF CONGRESS NOW
BACKGROUND INFORMATION, TALKING POINTS, ETC.
MAY 8, 2002

Background:
Recently, the U.S. Department of State announced that Cambodia will accept Cambodians who have been convicted of crimes in the United States. SEARAC calls for a hold on deportation until cases can be reviewed by the INS to ensure fairness in the deportation process. Many Southeast Asians that SEARAC has been in contact with accepted orders of removal in exchange for supervised release. Unaware that this repatriation agreement would be signed in the immediate future, many Cambodian detainees did not pursue appeals on
their deportation orders. In these cases many Cambodians did not have their cases heard by a judge and thoroughly reviewed.

This international agreement has the potential to harm large numbers of Cambodians in the United States - citizens as well as people who have not become citizens yet:
· According to Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) statistics, nearly 1,400 Cambodians have been issued "final orders of removal" and could be deported quickly.
· A SEARAC survey recently discovered that over half of those potential deportees are the main income-earners for their families, which typically include members who are American citizens and children.
· According to statistics from the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), 145,149 refugees entered the U.S. from Cambodia between 1975 and 1999. According to INS statistics, 46,455 people from Cambodia had naturalized to become U.S. citizens. These statistics lead us to believe that nearly 100,000 Cambodians in the U.S. arrived as refugees and are not now citizens.

All of them are at danger of deportation if they are found guilty of an "aggravated felony" crime - whether they actually commit the crime or not. These crimes can include shoplifting, marijuana possession, and driving while intoxicated.

Question and Answer:
Q: Haven't the majority of Cambodians facing repatriation already had fair evaluations of the cases?
A: No. In most cases, Cambodians were ordered deported under the 1996 immigration reform laws before the courts had ruled on the meaning of those laws. For example, in most cases, Cambodians facing deportation were denied a chance for a hearing before an immigration judge in which they could present the equities of their cases - including such factors as the age they came to the United States, their rehabilitation, and their lack of ties to Cambodia. The Supreme Court ruled last June that this was illegal in cases
of people convicted before 1996 who served less than five years in prison.

No Cambodian should be repatriated until they have had the hearings required by the Supreme Court's decision. In addition, Congress is seeking to restore hearings to other immigrants convicted after 1996. No Cambodian should be repatriated while Congress is considering this legislation.

Q: Isn't it too late to review these cases?
A: No. Many Cambodians were told by INS officers, lawyers or others that they would not be deported if they accepted a deportation order. As a result, the legality of their deportation orders was never tested. No one should be deported under an unlawful order.

Q: What are examples of orders that are unlawful?
A: In some cases, the order is unlawful because the person was denied the right to a hearing. In other cases, the order is unlawful because the INS used too harsh a rule for determining what qualifies as an "aggravated felony." For example, some courts have said that the INS was wrong to call driving under the influence an aggravated felony.

Legislation/Action Alert:

The Family Reunification Act of 2002 (H.R. 1452) would allow the Attorney General to cancel an order of removal for a legal permanent resident who poses no danger to persons or property and is not a threat to the community. The Act also allows a cancellation of removal for family unity or humanitarian reasons. Currently the bill is being reviewed by the full Judiciary committee.

Take Action:

Please call your member of Congress and urge them to:
1. Urge INS Commissioner James Ziglar to delay deportation of Cambodians until a thorough review process is in place.
2. Help pass The Family Reunification Act of 2002 (H.R. 1452) which gives the Attorney General discretion to cancel an order of removal for humanitarian and family reunification reasons.

You can find your member of Congress by going to
http://clerkweb.house.gov/mbrcmtee/members/housemem.htm for members of the House of Representatives and
http://www.senate.gov/senators/senator_by_state.cfm for members of the Senate. Please let TC Duong at SEARAC know if you have called or are planning on calling your member of Congress or any other advocacy on this issue. If you have further thoughts or know of anyone with an order of removal who is willing to speak out, please contact TC at 202-667-4690 or e-mail at tcduong@searac.org.

Talking Points:
§ Restore fairness in the detention and deportation process. Many Southeast Asians accepted orders of removal in exchange for supervised release. Unaware that this repatriation agreement would be signed in the immediate future, several Cambodian detainees did not pursue appeals on their deportation orders. In these cases many Cambodians did not appeal their orders of removal and have their cases heard by a judge. Furthermore, Southeast Asians must be informed about the consequences of pleading guilty and being convicted of offenses when the plea is made for the purposes of expediting their release and gaining suspended sentences.

§ Deportees have strong ties to the United States. Many deportees have family who fought alongside U.S troops during the Vietnam War. Also, in survey of Southeast Asians in detention showed that the average age of arrival to the United States was nine years old and the average length of time that detainees have lived in this country is 20 years. One-third of the detainees SEARAC spoke with said that they had American-born children and over half said they were their families' primary source of income.

§ Deportees may suffer persecution if sent back. Many detainees are victims or torture themselves or from families who suffered human rights abuses in Cambodia. Before Cambodian Americans can be deported we ask for assurances that they will be treated fairly and not be targeted by the Cambodian government.

§ Southeast Asians who live in the United States are often ill-equipped to understand the American legal system because of the language difficulties and because the legal systems of their homelands are so different. These facts mitigate against the abilities of many Southeast Asians to protect their own interests in courts of law.
RETURN




Citizens & Immigrants For Equal Justice (CIEJ)
Subject: DC ADVOCATES MEETING, 7/8/02, 10:00 AM

Sure.

As I said, we are a grassroots coalition of American/Legal resident families who have a legal resident loved one in deportation proceedings due to the enactment and retroactive application of the 1996 Immigration acts, AEDPA, and IIRIRA. I am an American, my husband is a Canadian national who has lived in the U.S. as an LPR for 45 of his 50 years. He was educated in the U.S. (we grew up in the same neighborhood), has been a working taxpayer for 35 years, owns and operates his own business, is a Vietnam Era veteran of the U.S. Army, and has no ties to his birth country. In 1993 he was released from a Texas prison after serving 3 years for possession of a controlled substance.

At that time he was deportable (much to our surprise), but eligible to apply for a waiver of relief hearing.  At the end of a two day, intense hearing, we were granted a waiver of relief. The INS appealed and because it languished with the BIA for 3 years, the enactment and retroactive application of AEDPA took our waiver away, and plummeted us into this legal abyss that so many legal residents are finding themselves in because of those acts and now the U.S.A. PATRIOT Act.  We thought when this happened to us, that surely we could reach out to our elected representatives and they would straighten out this mess, but boy was I a naive American. From March - December of 1997, I wrote, called, and visited every lawmaker I could trying to get someone to listen to me, but none would. By January of 1998, my husband and I decided that the only way we were going to get Washington's attention was with a louder voice, thus CIEJ was born.

We are a group of around 1000 families in 29 states, representing 64 countries who are actively seeking to educate our lawmakers on who LPR's are, and their place in American society. We are also seeking to convince them that mandatory detention, and deportation is wrong. A fair process should be restored to our immigration laws, as well bond hearings, and judicial review. Along with speaking out at any opportunity about all of the other issues that have sprung from these laws, we are a support group for one another, we keep each other's spirits up, and we work to empower those who feel that they have no say, into standing up and fighting for their and their family's rights. We are in no way affiliated with INS.

You probably haven't heard much about us because we only got our nonprofit status a year ago, and are underfunded, therefore limited in our ability to advertise. What has emerged as our "specialty" is our ability to break through the protective barrier that our families surround ourselves with, and convince them to share their stories with us, so that we can effectively illustrate our issues.  I apologize for the length of this email, but explaining the who, what, when, etc of CIEJ is hard to put in condensed form.  I do thank you for your interest, and your patience in reading this lengthy thing. I hope this answers your questions, but feel free to ask more if I left something out.

Laurie
--------------------------------------
Laurie Kozuba
Founder/Director
Citizens & Immigrants For Equal Justice (CIEJ)
Mesquite, TX 75150
Voice/Fax 972-329-7080
CIEJ A Coalition of families <http://www.ciej.org/>



Copyright 2002 Cambodian American National Council
Website: www.CANCweb.org     E-mail: canc@CANCweb.org